Re: [Mimblewimble] On the Code of Conduct

2018-09-14 Thread Daniel Kelly
I agree with Casey's statements completely, maybe the document could use some refinement but your (Luke) attitude and ultimatums are the problems. They are not constructive what-so-ever. Thank you, Dan On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:48 PM Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at

Re: [Mimblewimble] On the Code of Conduct

2018-09-14 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Casey Rodarmor wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > wrote: >> except, as i've patiently mentioned each time people very kindly contribute >> their insights: the project leader, ignatius, has made it absolutely >> clear that any

Re: [Mimblewimble] On the Code of Conduct

2018-09-14 Thread Casey Rodarmor
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > except, as i've patiently mentioned each time people very kindly contribute > their insights: the project leader, ignatius, has made it absolutely > clear that any efforts to provide insights - even sadly yours, casey, > are ne

Re: [Mimblewimble] On the Code of Conduct

2018-09-14 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Casey Rodarmor wrote: > Hi all, > > I changed the subject of my reply to "On The Code of Conduct", so as > not to mix threads of conversation. that's a good idea, i often forget that. thank you. > Please keep in mind that this is only my interpretation of the c

Re: [Mimblewimble] Relative Locktimes in Grin

2018-09-14 Thread Antioch
> Your email matches the idea of "triggers" that I originally proposed > for enabling relative timelocks back in Jan 2017: > https://lists.launchpad.net/mimblewimble/msg00025.html > > The conclusion that Andrew Poelstra and I came to back then was the > same: kernels (previously referred to as "exc

Re: [Mimblewimble] Relative Locktimes in Grin

2018-09-14 Thread Antioch
John, > The real problem seems to be that anyone doing a sync from genesis afterwards, > lacks the data to verify the relative timelock, since the referenced > output is obviously > gone from all later utxo sets. Yes agreed - this is what we had been discussing in gitter. "Historical validators"

[Mimblewimble] On the Code of Conduct

2018-09-14 Thread Casey Rodarmor
Hi all, I changed the subject of my reply to "On The Code of Conduct", so as not to mix threads of conversation. Please keep in mind that this is only my interpretation of the code of conduct. I am on the Grin moderation team, but this is not an official position, only my personal thoughts. I've