ping x2
Also an 8.0 candidate, now that 8.0 exists.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:52 PM, nobled wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, nob...@dreamwidth.org wrote:
>> The error was erroneously removed in this commit:
>>
>> 719909698c67c287a393d2380278e7b7495ae018
>> "mesa: Rewrite the w
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We well over due for a 8.0.1 release, so I thought
> we do it aggressively this week. A quick rc tomorrow
> and a release on Thursday or Friday? Is that okay with
> people, comments please?
This should be cherry-picked, right?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:05:08PM -0700, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We well over due for a 8.0.1 release, so I thought
> we do it aggressively this week. A quick rc tomorrow
> and a release on Thursday or Friday? Is that okay with
> people, comments please?
Did you mean 8.1? 8.0.1 has
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > We well over due for a 8.0.1 release, so I thought
> > we do it aggressively this week. A quick rc tomorrow
> > and a release on Thursday or Friday? Is that okay with
> > people, comments pl
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:05:08PM -0700, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > We well over due for a 8.0.1 release, so I thought
> > we do it aggressively this week. A quick rc tomorrow
> > and a release on Thursday or Friday? Is that okay with
> > people, co
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47261
Brian Paul changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Brian Paul changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
From: Dave Airlie
valgrind complained about an uninitialised value being used in
glsl_parser_extras.cpp, and this was the one it was giving out about.
Just initialise the value in the fakectx.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
src/glsl/builtins/tools/generate_builtins.py |1 +
1 files change
On 03/12/2012 06:05 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
Hi all
We well over due for a 8.0.1 release, so I thought
we do it aggressively this week. A quick rc tomorrow
and a release on Thursday or Friday? Is that okay with
people, comments please?
8.0.2 sounds good to me, Jakob. I'll review my recent
On 03/13/2012 08:53 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
From: Dave Airlie
valgrind complained about an uninitialised value being used in
glsl_parser_extras.cpp, and this was the one it was giving out about.
Just initialise the value in the fakectx.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
src/glsl/builtins/tools/g
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #1 from Brian Paul 2012-03-13 08:10:26 PDT
---
Is it possible to get a test program or an apitrace of the app? The later tool
is available at https://github.com/apitrace/apitrace
Does the failure still happen if you draw fewer poly
This looks good to me. One minor comment below.
On 03/13/2012 01:51 AM, nobled wrote:
ping x2
Also an 8.0 candidate, now that 8.0 exists.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:52 PM, nobled wrote:
ping?
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, nob...@dreamwidth.org wrote:
The error was erroneously removed i
From: Dave Airlie
ir_validate.cpp: In member function ‘virtual ir_visitor_status
ir_validate::visit_leave(ir_swizzle*)’:
ir_validate.cpp:458:66: warning: narrowing conversion of
‘ir->ir_swizzle::mask.ir_swizzle_mask::x’ from ‘unsigned int’ to ‘int’ inside {
} is ill-formed in C++11 [-Wnarrowin
If no one objects, I'm going to push this series tomorrow.
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 07:14:18PM -0500, Tom Stellard wrote:
> ---
> configure.ac |1 +
> src/gallium/drivers/.gitignore|3 +++
> src/gallium/drivers/Makefile | 12
> src/g
FWIW, I personally have no objections against the "automakification" provided
it does not cause build failures, or that any unintended build failure is soon
addressed. That is, better not commit this sort of stuff right before leaving
for the pub ;-)
Jose
- Original Message -
> If no o
shader-db results:
Total instructions: 212648 -> 206044
614/1246 programs affected (49.3%)
178350 -> 171746 instructions in affected programs (3.7% reduction)
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp | 24 +---
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -
By making a bool fs_reg only have a defined low bit (matching CMP
output), instead of being a full 0 or 1 value, we reduce the ANDs
generated in logic chains like:
if (v_texcoord.x < 0.0 || v_texcoord.x > texwidth ||
v_texcoord.y < 0.0 || v_texcoord.y > 1.0)
discard;
My concern or
Hi,
Is Mesa 8.0 implementation on windows thread safe?
I have some test code that is doing rendering in parallel threads using
debug build of opengl32.dll and it is crashing in debug_free on list_del
operation.
The implementation of u_double_list.h does not seem to be thread safe, so I
believe if
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47248
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner
---
configure.ac |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index a2d906a..e7994b0 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ if tes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47248
--- Comment #1 from Matt Turner 2012-03-13 20:15:23 PDT ---
Created attachment 58416
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=58416
patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rec
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47248
Matt Turner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matts...@gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44697
Alan Coopersmith changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|xorg-t...@lists.x.org |mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.
llvm-3.1svn r15620 refactored the OProfile profiling code.
createOProfileJITEventListener was moved from the llvm namespace to the
llvm::JITEventListener namespace.
Signed-off-by: Vinson Lee
---
src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_misc.cpp |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deleti
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44697
Robert Hooker (Sarvatt) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from R
24 matches
Mail list logo
