Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/6] st_api: Remove st_module

2010-04-25 Thread Chia-I Wu
2010/4/25 Kristian Høgsberg : > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz >> -PUBLIC const struct st_module st_module_OpenGL_ES1 = { >> -   .api = ST_API_OPENGL_ES1, >> -   .create_api = st_manager_create_api >> -}; >> +PUBLIC struct st_api * >> +st_api_create_OpenGL_ES1() >> +{ >> +   re

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Refactor st_api and st/dri

2010-04-25 Thread Chia-I Wu
Hi Jakob, On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > This Patch series does some minor refactoring in the st_api interface > and some major one to st/dri. > The first patch drops the st_module struct from st_api. This is because it > was overlapping the st_api struct. Both repre

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/6] st_api: Remove st_module

2010-04-25 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
2010/4/25 Chia-I Wu : > 2010/4/25 Kristian Høgsberg : >> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz >>> -PUBLIC const struct st_module st_module_OpenGL_ES1 = { >>> -   .api = ST_API_OPENGL_ES1, >>> -   .create_api = st_manager_create_api >>> -}; >>> +PUBLIC struct st_api * >>> +st_api_crea

[Mesa-dev] RFC: Remove internal flushes from Mesa state tracker

2010-04-25 Thread José Fonseca
Now that transfers are context operations it is the driver's responsibility to ensure that transfers happen in order with all other context operations, so flushes and finishes inside Mesa should be no longer necessary. The attached patch implements that. This should proportionate significant impro

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 19430] Humus DepthOfField2 demo: No matching FBConfig

2010-04-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19430 --- Comment #5 from Sven Arvidsson 2010-04-25 10:40:26 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=35279) --> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=35279) backtrace With the Xserver patched for pbuffer support, I can run the Windows version of

Re: [Mesa-dev] WebGL on linux

2010-04-25 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 19:48 +0200, Aljoša Mohorović wrote: > i've tried to enable webgl in chrome/webkit and firefox dev builds on > intel and ati cards but got the same results. > since i'm running opengl apps on both cards i guess it is something > related with webgl implementation in browsers. >