On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:09:38PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin
> wrote:
> > On 09/26/2012 11:59 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> >> I've pushed an automake-gallium2 branch to my repo with a number of
> >> fixes squashed-in.
> >>
> >> git://people.freedesktop.or
On 09/27/2012 12:19 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On 09/26/2012 10:55 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On 09/26/2012 04:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
Another issue is that the yacc-generated files are
On 09/26/2012 10:55 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Kenneth Graunke
> wrote:
>> On 09/26/2012 04:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
Another issue is that the yacc-generated files are not removed by 'make
clean',
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 04:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
>>> Another issue is that the yacc-generated files are not removed by 'make
>>> clean',
>>> but thats probably on purpose (do the generated
On 09/26/2012 04:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
>> Another issue is that the yacc-generated files are not removed by 'make
>> clean',
>> but thats probably on purpose (do the generated files get shipped in the
>> release tarball?),
>> I should've r
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Török Edwin
wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 11:59 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> I've pushed an automake-gallium2 branch to my repo with a number of
>> fixes squashed-in.
>>
>> git://people.freedesktop.org/~mattst88/mesa automake-gallium2
>
> Nice progress!
>
> I was able to bui
On 09/26/2012 11:59 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> I've pushed an automake-gallium2 branch to my repo with a number of
> fixes squashed-in.
>
> git://people.freedesktop.org/~mattst88/mesa automake-gallium2
Nice progress!
I was able to build it after reversing the 'if' below.
It doesn't load though:
l
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
>
> I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
> large chunks are making nearly identical changes to different
> directories. Plus, incorrect changes in the b
Matt Turner writes:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Marcin Slusarz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:38:31AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slusarz
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Installation is part of the testing procedure, after all.
>>> >
>>> > No. People
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Marcin Slusarz
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:52:28PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
>>
>> I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
>> large chunks are making nearly identic
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:52:28PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
>
> I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
> large chunks are making nearly identical changes to different
> directories. Plus, incorrect changes
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Marcin Slusarz
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:00:23AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Marcin Slusarz
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:38:31AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slu
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:00:23AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Marcin Slusarz
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:38:31AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slusarz
> >> wrote:
> >> >> Installation is part of the testing p
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Török Edwin
wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 12:52 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>
>> Please help me find problems now before it goes into master. Here's a
>> branch. It's easy to test. If you don't test and I commit this in a
>> week and break your stuff, I'm sorry, but you didn
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Marcin Slusarz
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:38:31AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slusarz
>> wrote:
>> >> Installation is part of the testing procedure, after all.
>> >
>> > No. People test code, not build systems.
>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:57:20PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 12:52 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> >
> > Please help me find problems now before it goes into master. Here's a
> > branch. It's easy to test. If you don't test and I commit this in a
> > week and break your stuff, I'm sorry,
On 09/25/2012 12:52 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>
> Please help me find problems now before it goes into master. Here's a
> branch. It's easy to test. If you don't test and I commit this in a
> week and break your stuff, I'm sorry, but you didn't test.
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mattst88/mesa/lo
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:38:31AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slusarz
> wrote:
> >> Installation is part of the testing procedure, after all.
> >
> > No. People test code, not build systems.
>
> I invite you to reread the subject of this email.
So you do
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marcin Slusarz
wrote:
>> Installation is part of the testing procedure, after all.
>
> No. People test code, not build systems.
I invite you to reread the subject of this email.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:02:26AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Marcin Slusarz
> wrote:
> > With this branch, top level lib directory is not created, so it's impossible
> > to test mesa without installing it first.
>
> Indeed. This has been planned for a while.
Ne
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Marcin Slusarz
wrote:
> With this branch, top level lib directory is not created, so it's impossible
> to test mesa without installing it first.
Indeed. This has been planned for a while. Installation is part of the
testing procedure, after all.
Do DESTDIR=... ma
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:52:28PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
>
> I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
> large chunks are making nearly identical changes to different
> directories. Plus, incorrect changes
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:35:31AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> > This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
> >
> > I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
> > large chunks are making nearly identica
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> This series of 105 patches finishes the automake conversion.
>
> I don't think the series needs to be reviewed patch by patch, since
> large chunks are making nearly identical changes to different
> directories. Plus, incorrect changes in the b
24 matches
Mail list logo
