On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 01:32:20PM -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
> The only difference I could see is that in the old code you passed
> &cb->buffer (which maybe points to a value?) directly into u_upload_data()
> where as in the new code, you do pass &cb->buffer as the parameter rbuffer
> to r600_u
The only difference I could see is that in the old code you passed
&cb->buffer (which maybe points to a value?) directly into u_upload_data()
where as in the new code, you do pass &cb->buffer as the parameter rbuffer
to r600_upload_const_buffer(), but then inside that function, you do
*rbuffer = NU
