Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 16/19] gallium/nouveau: handle query_renderer caps

2014-08-14 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Am 15.08.2014 00:33, schrieb Ilia Mirkin: > Hm, I wonder what GETPARAM_PCI_DEVICE returns for GK20A. Also, not > 100% sure what UMA means, but GK20A (NVEA) would defnitely qualify. > Not sure about the other IGP's that steal vram from the system. All > IGPs end in 0xa-0xf though, so they're easy to

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 16/19] gallium/nouveau: handle query_renderer caps

2014-08-14 Thread Emil Velikov
On 14/08/14 23:33, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Hm, I wonder what GETPARAM_PCI_DEVICE returns for GK20A. Also, not > 100% sure what UMA means, but GK20A (NVEA) would defnitely qualify. > Not sure about the other IGP's that steal vram from the system. All > IGPs end in 0xa-0xf though, so they're easy to det

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 16/19] gallium/nouveau: handle query_renderer caps

2014-08-14 Thread Ilia Mirkin
Hm, I wonder what GETPARAM_PCI_DEVICE returns for GK20A. Also, not 100% sure what UMA means, but GK20A (NVEA) would defnitely qualify. Not sure about the other IGP's that steal vram from the system. All IGPs end in 0xa-0xf though, so they're easy to detect. (But some might have dedicated vram, not