On 01/13/2014 01:04 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Kenneth Graunke writes:
>
>> On 01/09/2014 09:31 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> Kenneth Graunke writes:
>>>
On 12/13/2013 09:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:26:40AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>> Broadwell uses 48-b
Kenneth Graunke writes:
> On 01/09/2014 09:31 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Kenneth Graunke writes:
>>
>>> On 12/13/2013 09:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:26:40AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Broadwell uses 48-bit addresses. The first DWord is the low 32 bits,
>
On 01/09/2014 09:31 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Kenneth Graunke writes:
>
>> On 12/13/2013 09:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:26:40AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
Broadwell uses 48-bit addresses. The first DWord is the low 32 bits,
and the second DWord is the h
Kenneth Graunke writes:
> On 12/13/2013 09:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:26:40AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>>> Broadwell uses 48-bit addresses. The first DWord is the low 32 bits,
>>> and the second DWord is the high 16 bits.
>>>
>>> Since individual buffers shoul
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:04:53AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 09:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:26:40AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> >> Broadwell uses 48-bit addresses. The first DWord is the low 32 bits,
> >> and the second DWord is the high 16 bi
On 12/13/2013 09:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:26:40AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>> Broadwell uses 48-bit addresses. The first DWord is the low 32 bits,
>> and the second DWord is the high 16 bits.
>>
>> Since individual buffers shouldn't be larger than 4GB in size,
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:26:40AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Broadwell uses 48-bit addresses. The first DWord is the low 32 bits,
> and the second DWord is the high 16 bits.
>
> Since individual buffers shouldn't be larger than 4GB in size, any
> offsets into those buffers (buffer->offset +