On 15 November 2017 at 19:30, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2017-11-14 07:37:27, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 10 November 2017 at 23:39, Jordan Justen
>> wrote:
>> > On 2017-11-10 08:19:38, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> >> On 7 November 2017 at 11:54, Emil Velikov
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > From: Emil Velikov
>>
On 2017-11-14 07:37:27, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 10 November 2017 at 23:39, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > On 2017-11-10 08:19:38, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >> On 7 November 2017 at 11:54, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >> > From: Emil Velikov
> >> >
> >> > Checking the override was useful in the early stages of d
On 10 November 2017 at 23:39, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2017-11-10 08:19:38, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 7 November 2017 at 11:54, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> > From: Emil Velikov
>> >
>> > Checking the override was useful in the early stages of developing the
>> > extension.
>> >
>> > Now that everyth
On 2017-11-10 08:19:38, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 7 November 2017 at 11:54, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > From: Emil Velikov
> >
> > Checking the override was useful in the early stages of developing the
> > extension.
> >
> > Now that everything is wired, where possible, we can drop the check.
> > Doin
On 7 November 2017 at 11:54, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> Checking the override was useful in the early stages of developing the
> extension.
>
> Now that everything is wired, where possible, we can drop the check.
> Doing so allows us to simplify some of the related code.
>
> Cc:
