On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 04:05:49PM +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Bruno Jimenez writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2014-06-21 at 17:39 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >[...]
> >> The implementation of PIPE_TRANSFER_MAP_DIRECTLY introduced in PATCH 10
> >> has somewhat worrying semantics: A mapping with this
Bruno Jimenez writes:
> On Sat, 2014-06-21 at 17:39 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>[...]
>> The implementation of PIPE_TRANSFER_MAP_DIRECTLY introduced in PATCH 10
>> has somewhat worrying semantics: A mapping with this flag might become
>> stale unpredictably if a kernel is run, maybe from a dif
On Sat, 2014-06-21 at 17:39 +0200, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Bruno Jiménez writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is my second attempt to fix the mapping bug adding all the
> > suggestions that Tom Stellard sent, and, so far, it seems that
> > it is resolved.
> >
> > This series changes completely how Ope
Bruno Jiménez writes:
> Hi,
>
> This is my second attempt to fix the mapping bug adding all the
> suggestions that Tom Stellard sent, and, so far, it seems that
> it is resolved.
>
> This series changes completely how OpenCL buffers are handled
> by the r600g driver. Before this, we would add the
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 13:50 -0400, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Bruno Jiménez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is my second attempt to fix the mapping bug adding all the
> > suggestions that Tom Stellard sent, and, so far, it seems that
> > it is resolved.
> >
> > Th
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:01:50PM +0200, Bruno Jiménez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my second attempt to fix the mapping bug adding all the
> suggestions that Tom Stellard sent, and, so far, it seems that
> it is resolved.
>
> This series changes completely how OpenCL buffers are handled
> by the r6