On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> What if the existing operations were already exact?
>>
>> They aren't -- the builder makes them non-exact by default, and we
>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> What if the existing operations were already exact?
>
> They aren't -- the builder makes them non-exact by default, and we
> initialize the builder ourselves in this pass.
Hmm...
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> What if the existing operations were already exact?
They aren't -- the builder makes them non-exact by default, and we
initialize the builder ourselves in this pass.
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> The floating
What if the existing operations were already exact?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> The floating-point operations used to implement these have been
> carefully chosen to minimize rounding error while still getting decent
> performance. We don't want any optimizations to m
