On 03/03/2014 08:38 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
Update the comments for the packed formats to accurately reflect the
layout of the bits in the pixel. For example, for the packed format
MESA_FORMAT_R8G8B8A8, R is in the least significant position while
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> Update the comments for the packed formats to accurately reflect the
> layout of the bits in the pixel. For example, for the packed format
> MESA_FORMAT_R8G8B8A8, R is in the least significant position while A
> is in the most-significant positi
On 03/03/2014 10:45 AM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Just one minor bug, otherwise
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
Am 28.02.2014 18:59, schrieb Brian Paul:
Update the comments for the packed formats to accurately reflect the
layout of the bits in the pixel. For example, for the packed format
ME
Just one minor bug, otherwise
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
Am 28.02.2014 18:59, schrieb Brian Paul:
> Update the comments for the packed formats to accurately reflect the
> layout of the bits in the pixel. For example, for the packed format
> MESA_FORMAT_R8G8B8A8, R is in the least significa
