On 01/09/2012 08:36 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:44:17 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
GLSL spec boneheadedly says (a ^^ a) must actually be evaluated.
What it's trying to say there is that any side-effects of both LHS and
RHS will occur (as opposed to how&& or || work), not that
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:44:17 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
> GLSL spec boneheadedly says (a ^^ a) must actually be evaluated.
What it's trying to say there is that any side-effects of both LHS and
RHS will occur (as opposed to how && or || work), not that you actually
compute the expression that you
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> GLSL spec boneheadedly says (a ^^ a) must actually be evaluated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Turner
> ---
On second thought, maybe the better thing to do here is to evaluate $a
twice, which in most cases would be dead-code eliminated, and then
si
