Am 21.08.2013 02:05, schrieb Roland Mainz:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Roland Scheidegger
> wrote:
>> Am 21.08.2013 01:28, schrieb Roland Mainz:
>>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:12 AM, wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
> [snip]
>>> Can you check whether the new code supports -nan correc
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 21.08.2013 01:28, schrieb Roland Mainz:
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:12 AM, wrote:
>>> From: Roland Scheidegger
[snip]
>> Can you check whether the new code supports -nan correctly, please
>> (-nan is used by scientific software...
Am 21.08.2013 01:28, schrieb Roland Mainz:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:12 AM, wrote:
>> From: Roland Scheidegger
>>
>> The (complicated!) math is all identical, there's just minimal differences
>> how
>> sign bit is calculated plus there's an additional subtraction for the
>> argument
>> going
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:12 AM, wrote:
> From: Roland Scheidegger
>
> The (complicated!) math is all identical, there's just minimal differences how
> sign bit is calculated plus there's an additional subtraction for the argument
> going into the polynomial for cos.
> The logic stays 100% the s
