Eric Anholt writes:
> I'd prefer to see sbc stay with its current name, since that's its name
> in the specs we're trying to implement (GLX_OML_sync_control,
> GLX_INTEL_swap_event). If you drop the rename from the patch,
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt
Sounds good.
> I read that as "SBC is incr
Keith Packard writes:
> The easy part is turning on the extension, now that the X server has a patch
> to send the events.
>
> The only trick was making sure the Present extension reliably provided the
> right 'sbc' count back in the event, and that's done by making sure the sbc
> count is always
