On 6/13/12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Mike Frysinger
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Dan Nicholson
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 6/12/12, Stéphane Marchesin wrote:
>> >> > From: Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Mike Frysinger
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Dan Nicholson
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/12/12, Stéphane Marchesin wrote:
> >> > From: Mike Frysinger
> >> >
> >> > The intent of the message abov
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>
>> On 6/12/12, Stéphane Marchesin wrote:
>> > From: Mike Frysinger
>> >
>> > The intent of the message above it is right (we need to build those
>> > dependencies in that order) but
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 6/12/12, Stéphane Marchesin wrote:
> > From: Mike Frysinger
> >
> > The intent of the message above it is right (we need to build those
> > dependencies in that order) but the implementation is wrong, as it
> > can be executed in any or
On 6/12/12, Stéphane Marchesin wrote:
> From: Mike Frysinger
>
> The intent of the message above it is right (we need to build those
> dependencies in that order) but the implementation is wrong, as it
> can be executed in any order. To enforce the order, invoke make
> multiple times.
> ---
> sr