On 03/05/2022 17:27, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 03/05/2022 11:39, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 03/05/2022 13:22, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 02/05/2022 09:53, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 02/05/2022 10:54, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi n
On 03/05/2022 11:39, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 03/05/2022 13:22, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 02/05/2022 09:53, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 02/05/2022 10:54, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Som
On 03/05/2022 11:22, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 02/05/2022 09:53, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 02/05/2022 10:54, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Ake
On 03/05/2022 13:22, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 02/05/2022 09:53, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 02/05/2022 10:54, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem
On 02/05/2022 09:53, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 02/05/2022 10:54, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
- Rework error capture inter
...@lists.freedesktop.org; Thomas Hellström
; Bloomfield, Jon
; Daniel Vetter ;
Justen,
Jordan L ; Kenneth Graunke
; Abodunrin, Akeem G
; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/doc: add rfc section for small BAR uapi
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the
; Bloomfield, Jon
; Daniel Vetter ;
Justen,
Jordan L ; Kenneth Graunke
; Abodunrin, Akeem G
; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/doc: add rfc section for small BAR uapi
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2
On 02/05/2022 08:54, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
- Rework error capture interactions, including no longer needing
NEEDS
L ; Kenneth Graunke
; Abodunrin, Akeem G
; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/doc: add rfc section for small BAR uapi
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks
th Graunke
> ; Abodunrin, Akeem G
> ; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/doc: add rfc section for small BAR uapi
>
> On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
> >
> > v2:
&g
On 02/05/2022 10:54, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
- Rework error capture interactions, including no longer needing
NEEDS
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
- Rework error capture interactions, including no longer needing
NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS for objects marked for capture. (Th
On 27/04/2022 18:18, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 27/04/2022 07:48, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
One question though, how do we detect that this flag
(I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS) is accepted on a given
kernel?
I assume older kernels are going to reject object creation if we use
this flag?
On 27/04/2022 07:48, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
One question though, how do we detect that this flag
(I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS) is accepted on a given kernel?
I assume older kernels are going to reject object creation if we use
this flag?
From some offline discussion with Lionel
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:55:07AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Well usually we increment the drm minor version when adding some new flags
> on amdgpu.
>
> Additional to that just one comment from our experience with that: You don't
> just need one flag, but two. The first one is a hint which s
Am 27.04.22 um 17:02 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On 27/04/2022 07:55, Christian König wrote:
Well usually we increment the drm minor version when adding some new
flags on amdgpu.
Additional to that just one comment from our experience with that:
You don't just need one flag, but two. The first one
On 27/04/2022 07:55, Christian König wrote:
Well usually we increment the drm minor version when adding some new
flags on amdgpu.
Additional to that just one comment from our experience with that: You
don't just need one flag, but two. The first one is a hint which says
"CPU access needed" an
Well usually we increment the drm minor version when adding some new
flags on amdgpu.
Additional to that just one comment from our experience with that: You
don't just need one flag, but two. The first one is a hint which says
"CPU access needed" and the second is a promise which says "CPU acc
One question though, how do we detect that this flag
(I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS) is accepted on a given kernel?
I assume older kernels are going to reject object creation if we use
this flag?
I didn't plan to use __drm_i915_query_vma_info, but isn't it
inconsistent to select th
Hi Matt,
The proposal looks good to me.
Looking forward to try it on drm-tip.
-Lionel
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
v2:
- Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
- Rework error capture interac
20 matches
Mail list logo
