>> Which LLVM version where you using? The lp_bld_init.c behavior
varies tremendously with LLVM version.
LLVM version was 3.2 System was a Ivy Bridge Quadcore (so AVX would
be the best vector ISA available on that machine) OS was Windows 7 64
Bit___
me
, int
> start, int count, unsigned int numInstances, unsigned int
> baseInstance) Line 627 C
> opengl32.dll!vbo_exec_DrawArrays(unsigned int mode, int start, int
> count) Line 653 C
> Von: Jose Fonseca
> An: swiz...@t-online.de
> Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> Be
Jose,
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 17:22:03 Jose Fonseca wrote:
> That work has been merged (w/ LLVM 3.1 and MC-JIT support), however it's
> quite likely that's there are still race conditions, as nobody has been
> pursuing llvmpipe thread-safety so far.
Given the findings that lead to commit 9
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Betreff: Re: [Mesa-dev] thread safe llvmpipe
Datum: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:22:03 +0100
That work has been merged (w/ LLVM 3.1 and MC-JIT support),
however it's quite likely that's there are still race conditions, as
nob
That work has been merged (w/ LLVM 3.1 and MC-JIT support), however it's quite
likely that's there are still race conditions, as nobody has been pursuing
llvmpipe thread-safety so far.
Jose
- Original Message -
> Last year end of march i remember there was a discusssion about the
> t
Last year end of march i remember there was a discusssion about the
thread safety in llvmpipe.
It seems that llvmpipe was not thread safe since the underlying LLVM
contexts were shared, but there was a branch mentioned that fixes this
issue and that was planned to be merged to the mainlin
