Hi Chris,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 04:26:05PM +0800, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>> I just pushed the driver to master, under the name ilo. The driver is
>> still new and has many bugs or known issues, but I will continue
>> improving it.
>
> FYI, you c
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 04:26:05PM +0800, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> I just pushed the driver to master, under the name ilo. The driver is
> still new and has many bugs or known issues, but I will continue
> improving it.
FYI, you can use:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Device0"
Driver "In
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> Per the discussion, i965g is confusing and misleading. Instead of
>> preventing the confusions via
>>
>> --with-gallium-drivers=i965g-unofficial or
>> --with-gallium-driver
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Per the discussion, i965g is confusing and misleading. Instead of
> preventing the confusions via
>
> --with-gallium-drivers=i965g-unofficial or
> --with-gallium-drivers=experimental-i965g,
>
> which kind of makes i965g a second
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Chia-I Wu writes:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> Per the discussion, i965g is confusing and misleading. Instead of
>> preventing the confusions via
>>
>> --with-gallium-drivers=i965g-unofficial or
>> --with-gallium-drivers=experimental-i965g,
>>
>>
Chia-I Wu writes:
> Hi list,
>
> Per the discussion, i965g is confusing and misleading. Instead of
> preventing the confusions via
>
> --with-gallium-drivers=i965g-unofficial or
> --with-gallium-drivers=experimental-i965g,
>
> which kind of makes i965g a second-class citizen, I think it is b
Hi list,
Per the discussion, i965g is confusing and misleading. Instead of
preventing the confusions via
--with-gallium-drivers=i965g-unofficial or
--with-gallium-drivers=experimental-i965g,
which kind of makes i965g a second-class citizen, I think it is better
to rename it. Then whenever
