On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 10:39 +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 20:14 +1100, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:24 +0200, Joakim Sindholt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:58 +0200, Fabio wrote:
> > > > Can the patches at
> > > > http://lists.fre
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 20:14 +1100, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:24 +0200, Joakim Sindholt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:58 +0200, Fabio wrote:
> > > Can the patches at
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2011-August/011099.html
> > > be con
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:24 +0200, Joakim Sindholt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:58 +0200, Fabio wrote:
> > Can the patches at
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2011-August/011099.html
> > be considered for merging?
> >
> > Sharing libgallium should save some MB of installed s
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:58 +0200, Fabio wrote:
> Can the patches at
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2011-August/011099.html
> be considered for merging?
>
> Sharing libgallium should save some MB of installed space.
And be an ABI nightmare for distributions
Can the patches at
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2011-August/011099.html
be considered for merging?
Sharing libgallium should save some MB of installed space.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesk