On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:16:06AM +0200, Martin Peres wrote:
> On 10/01/17 23:23, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >Not much has changed in the couple of years since last posting, just a
> >lot of rebasing.
> >
> >Still the major open question is how much locking do individual contexts
> >require amongst a s
On 10/01/17 23:23, Chris Wilson wrote:
Not much has changed in the couple of years since last posting, just a
lot of rebasing.
Still the major open question is how much locking do individual contexts
require amongst a shared set - can we rely of the upper layer providing
sufficient serialisation
Not much has changed in the couple of years since last posting, just a
lot of rebasing.
Still the major open question is how much locking do individual contexts
require amongst a shared set - can we rely of the upper layer providing
sufficient serialisation around access to brw_context?
The 40% i
