Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-08-03 Thread Brian Paul
On 08/02/2010 04:49 PM, keith whitwell wrote: On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Brian Paul wrote: On 08/01/2010 01:55 AM, Chia-I Wu wrote: On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Zack Rusinwrote: On Friday 30 July 2010 17:51:21 Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: On 30 jul 2010, at 14.02, Jakob Bornecran

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-08-02 Thread Vinson Lee
top.org > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird > way > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Brian Paul wrote: > > On 08/01/2010 01:55 AM, Chia-I Wu wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Zack Rusin  wrote: > >&

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-08-02 Thread keith whitwell
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Brian Paul wrote: > On 08/01/2010 01:55 AM, Chia-I Wu wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Zack Rusin  wrote: >>> >>> On Friday 30 July 2010 17:51:21 Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: On 30 jul 2010, at 14.02, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > > On 30 jul

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-08-02 Thread Brian Paul
On 08/01/2010 01:55 AM, Chia-I Wu wrote: On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Zack Rusin wrote: On Friday 30 July 2010 17:51:21 Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: On 30 jul 2010, at 14.02, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: On 30 jul 2010, at 13.32, Brian Paul wrote: On 07/30/2010 12:38 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: Hi

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-08-02 Thread Keith Whitwell
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 00:55 -0700, Chia-I Wu wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Zack Rusin wrote: > > On Friday 30 July 2010 17:51:21 Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > >> On 30 jul 2010, at 14.02, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > >> > On 30 jul 2010, at 13.32, Brian Paul wrote: > >> >> On 07/30/2010 12:

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-08-01 Thread Chia-I Wu
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Zack Rusin wrote: > On Friday 30 July 2010 17:51:21 Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: >> On 30 jul 2010, at 14.02, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: >> > On 30 jul 2010, at 13.32, Brian Paul wrote: >> >> On 07/30/2010 12:38 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: >> >>> Hi Brian, >> >>> >> >>> I a

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-07-30 Thread Zack Rusin
On Friday 30 July 2010 17:51:21 Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > On 30 jul 2010, at 14.02, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > > On 30 jul 2010, at 13.32, Brian Paul wrote: > >> On 07/30/2010 12:38 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > >>> Hi Brian, > >>> > >>> I am facing a strange segfault with r600g on top of lastest gi

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-07-30 Thread Marek Olšák
An r300g user seems to hit this issue when st/mesa uses Draw for feedback mode, in Compiz. There is the backtrace attached in the bug report below. The reporter doesn't use LLVM too and he bisected the same bad commit as you (gallium: implement bounds checking for constant buffers). https://bugs.f

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-07-30 Thread Jerome Glisse
On 07/30/2010 05:02 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: On 30 jul 2010, at 13.32, Brian Paul wrote: On 07/30/2010 12:38 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: Hi Brian, I am facing a strange segfault with r600g on top of lastest git, git bisect pointed to gallium: implement bounds checking for constant buffers My

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-07-30 Thread Jakob Bornecrantz
On 30 jul 2010, at 14.02, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: On 30 jul 2010, at 13.32, Brian Paul wrote: On 07/30/2010 12:38 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: Hi Brian, I am facing a strange segfault with r600g on top of lastest git, git bisect pointed to gallium: implement bounds checking for constant buffers

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-07-30 Thread Jakob Bornecrantz
On 30 jul 2010, at 13.32, Brian Paul wrote: On 07/30/2010 12:38 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: Hi Brian, I am facing a strange segfault with r600g on top of lastest git, git bisect pointed to gallium: implement bounds checking for constant buffers My feeling is that it should only affect software

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-07-30 Thread Jerome Glisse
On 07/30/2010 04:32 PM, Brian Paul wrote: On 07/30/2010 12:38 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: Hi Brian, I am facing a strange segfault with r600g on top of lastest git, git bisect pointed to gallium: implement bounds checking for constant buffers My feeling is that it should only affect software pipel

Re: [Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-07-30 Thread Brian Paul
On 07/30/2010 12:38 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote: Hi Brian, I am facing a strange segfault with r600g on top of lastest git, git bisect pointed to gallium: implement bounds checking for constant buffers My feeling is that it should only affect software pipeline but somehow r600g seem to take differen

[Mesa-dev] gallium bound checking patch broke r600g in weird way

2010-07-30 Thread Jerome Glisse
Hi Brian, I am facing a strange segfault with r600g on top of lastest git, git bisect pointed to gallium: implement bounds checking for constant buffers My feeling is that it should only affect software pipeline but somehow r600g seem to take different path now, attached if full but i can't make