Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2016-02-22 Thread Kenneth Graunke
On Monday, February 22, 2016 12:20:02 PM PST Jose Fonseca wrote: > On 22/02/16 02:59, Eric Anholt wrote: > > Brian Paul writes: > > > >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jason Ekstrand > >> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On Feb 20, 2016 1:19 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote: > > fwiw, I think a *small*

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2016-02-22 Thread Jose Fonseca
On 22/02/16 02:59, Eric Anholt wrote: Brian Paul writes: On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: On Feb 20, 2016 1:19 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote: fwiw, I think a *small* number of topic branches in certain cases makes sense.. I'm definitely in support of a TTL limit (ie. auto

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2016-02-21 Thread Eric Anholt
Brian Paul writes: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jason Ekstrand > wrote: > >> >> On Feb 20, 2016 1:19 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote: >> > >> > fwiw, I think a *small* number of topic branches in certain cases >> > makes sense.. I'm definitely in support of a TTL limit (ie. >> > automatically nuke

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2016-02-21 Thread Steven Newbury
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 13:41 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On Feb 20, 2016 1:19 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote: > > > > fwiw, I think a *small* number of topic branches in certain cases > > makes sense..  I'm definitely in support of a TTL limit (ie. > > automatically nuke topic branches with no activity

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2016-02-21 Thread Brian Paul
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Feb 20, 2016 1:19 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote: > > > > fwiw, I think a *small* number of topic branches in certain cases > > makes sense.. I'm definitely in support of a TTL limit (ie. > > automatically nuke topic branches with no activity

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2016-02-21 Thread Rob Clark
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On Feb 20, 2016 1:19 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote: >> >> fwiw, I think a *small* number of topic branches in certain cases >> makes sense.. I'm definitely in support of a TTL limit (ie. >> automatically nuke topic branches with no activity in N m

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2016-02-21 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Jason Ekstrand > wrote: > > On Feb 20, 2016 1:19 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote: > >> > >> fwiw, I think a *small* number of topic branches in certain cases > >> makes sense.. I'm definitely in support of a TTL limit (

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2016-02-20 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Feb 20, 2016 1:19 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote: > > fwiw, I think a *small* number of topic branches in certain cases > makes sense.. I'm definitely in support of a TTL limit (ie. > automatically nuke topic branches with no activity in N months, or > similar..) I agree. Sometimes something big comes

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2016-02-20 Thread Rob Clark
fwiw, I think a *small* number of topic branches in certain cases makes sense.. I'm definitely in support of a TTL limit (ie. automatically nuke topic branches with no activity in N months, or similar..) BR, -R On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > It's not so important now that

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-22 Thread Marek Olšák
It's not so important now that the amdgpu driver is about to be merged. Speaking of other branches, I think removing the old feature branches is a good idea. Marek On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 06/22/2015 10:40 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: >> I will happily remove the bran

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-22 Thread Ian Romanick
On 06/22/2015 10:40 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > I will happily remove the branch after the kernel driver lands. > > I also wonder why all Mesa developers can force-push branches in Mesa > but not libdrm. That's probably just historical. We probably ought to restrict that on Mesa as well. It sounds

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-22 Thread Marek Olšák
I will happily remove the branch after the kernel driver lands. I also wonder why all Mesa developers can force-push branches in Mesa but not libdrm. Marek On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Christian König > wrote: >> On 22.06.2015 15:41, I

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-22 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Christian König wrote: > On 22.06.2015 15:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:23:54PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-22 Thread Christian König
On 22.06.2015 15:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:23:54PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: On 22.06.2015 00:31, Ilia Mir

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-22 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:23:54PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> >> On 22.06.2015 00:31, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jun

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-22 Thread Tom Stellard
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:23:54PM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > >> On 22.06.2015 00:31, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Emil Velikov > >>> wrote: > On

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-22 Thread Marek Olšák
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 22.06.2015 00:31, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Emil Velikov >>> wrote: On 20/06/15 10:01, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote: > Ilia Mirkin writes

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-21 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 22.06.2015 00:31, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Emil Velikov >> wrote: >>> On 20/06/15 10:01, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote: Ilia Mirkin writes: > Hello, > > There are a *ton* of branche

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 22.06.2015 00:31, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Emil Velikov > wrote: >> On 20/06/15 10:01, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote: >>> Ilia Mirkin writes: >>> Hello, There are a *ton* of branches in the upstream mesa git. Here is a full list: >>> [.

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-21 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 20/06/15 10:01, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote: >> Ilia Mirkin writes: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> There are a *ton* of branches in the upstream mesa git. Here is a full list: >>> >> [...] >>> is there >>> any reason to keep these around with t

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-21 Thread Emil Velikov
On 20/06/15 10:01, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote: > Ilia Mirkin writes: > >> Hello, >> >> There are a *ton* of branches in the upstream mesa git. Here is a full list: >> > [...] >> is there >> any reason to keep these around with the exception of: >> >> master >> $version (i.e. 9.0, 10.0, mesa_7

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-20 Thread Christian König
Hi Ilia, oh, yes please. Especially since some people tend to completely mirror the mesa master repository including all those old branches. This sometimes creates quite a mess. Regards, Christian. On 20.06.2015 02:10, Ilia Mirkin wrote: Hello, There are a *ton* of branches in the upstream

Re: [Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-20 Thread Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen
Ilia Mirkin writes: > Hello, > > There are a *ton* of branches in the upstream mesa git. Here is a full list: > [...] > is there > any reason to keep these around with the exception of: > > master > $version (i.e. 9.0, 10.0, mesa_7_7_branch, etc) Instead of outright deleting old branches, it wou

[Mesa-dev] abundance of branches in mesa.git

2015-06-19 Thread Ilia Mirkin
Hello, There are a *ton* of branches in the upstream mesa git. Here is a full list: origin/10.0 origin/10.1 origin/10.2 origin/10.3 origin/10.4 origin/10.5 origin/10.6 origin/7.10 origin/7.11 origin/7.8 origin/7.8-gles origin/7.9 origin/8.0 origin/9.0 origin/9.1 or