On Sunday, February 01, 2015 01:17:19 PM Eric Anholt wrote:
> I'm pretty happy with how it turned out. What I'm not sure on is that
> I've got a couple of places where I replicated another transformation,
> like fsat(fsat(a)) -> fsat(a) but with a lowered fsat. I could see
> potentially having on
I'm pretty happy with how it turned out. What I'm not sure on is that
I've got a couple of places where I replicated another transformation,
like fsat(fsat(a)) -> fsat(a) but with a lowered fsat. I could see
potentially having only the canonical form appear in nir_opt_algebraic,
and I'd have two
