On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:47:25 -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > The non-intel/swrast code is not tested. I don't have the hardware,
> > now that r300 is gone.
> >
> > One the intel side, there's one regression on the last commit of the
> > series,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The non-intel/swrast code is not tested. I don't have the hardware,
> now that r300 is gone.
>
> One the intel side, there's one regression on the last commit of the
> series, in gles2 conformance (I wouldn't push that commit until it's
> fixe
The non-intel/swrast code is not tested. I don't have the hardware,
now that r300 is gone.
One the intel side, there's one regression on the last commit of the
series, in gles2 conformance (I wouldn't push that commit until it's
fixed). I haven't tracked it down yet -- I can't even figure out ho
