Good questions,
> 1. How can we minimize the effort of maintaining two repositories? (I don't
> think anyone here would support dropping the HTML docs, as they feed into
> the main Mesa website).
I agree that maintaining two repos would be bad, but we don't need to
do that. Sphinx can generate HT
On 27 August 2016 at 01:09, Nicholas Bishop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose a conversion of Mesa's documentation to
> reStructuredText (RST) and hosting the result on readthedocs.org. The
> intent is to make Mesa's documentation more accessible, searchable, and
> easier to edit.
>
> I put to
On 09/07/2016 07:58 PM, Nicholas Bishop wrote:
> Bump, any interest in this?
>
In my experience rST is much nicer to write than pure HTML, and I like
how the output looks. Definitive yes on the rST instead of HTML, no
strong opinion on readthedocs.org vs self-hosted.
Regards,
Vedran
--
Vedran
Bump, any interest in this?
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Nicholas Bishop
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose a conversion of Mesa's documentation to
> reStructuredText (RST) and hosting the result on readthedocs.org. The
> intent is to make Mesa's documentation more accessible, searchable,
Hi,
I'd like to propose a conversion of Mesa's documentation to
reStructuredText (RST) and hosting the result on readthedocs.org. The
intent is to make Mesa's documentation more accessible, searchable, and
easier to edit.
I put together a quick proof-of-concept here:
http://mesa-docs.readthe
