On 11/30/2012 01:16 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
On 12-11-30 12:13 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
On 12-11-23 02:21 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
On 12-11-21 12:48 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
On 11/20/2012 09:29 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
Any questions?
Do you
On 12-11-30 06:46 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 01:16 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>> On 12-11-30 12:13 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Benoit Jacob
>>> wrote:
On 12-11-23 02:21 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> On 12-11-21 12:48 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
>> On
On 12-11-30 12:13 PM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>> On 12-11-23 02:21 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>>> On 12-11-21 12:48 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
On 11/20/2012 09:29 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> Any questions?
> Do you support or oppose me
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> On 12-11-23 02:21 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>> On 12-11-21 12:48 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
>>> On 11/20/2012 09:29 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>>>
Any questions?
Do you support or oppose me asking FD.o admins to allow hidden bugs on
Mes
Aaargh
On 12-11-30 07:55 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> I can see that the security test bug is assigned to mesa-dev by
> default, so all comments go to the mailing list. I don't thínk that's
> desirable.
>
> Marek
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>> On 12-11-23 02:21 PM
I can see that the security test bug is assigned to mesa-dev by
default, so all comments go to the mailing list. I don't thínk that's
desirable.
Marek
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> On 12-11-23 02:21 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>> On 12-11-21 12:48 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
>>>
On 12-11-23 02:21 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> On 12-11-21 12:48 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
>> On 11/20/2012 09:29 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>>
>>> Any questions?
>>> Do you support or oppose me asking FD.o admins to allow hidden bugs on
>>> Mesa's bugzilla?
>>>
>>> Benoit
>> I support this. It seems a sen
On 12-11-21 12:48 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
> On 11/20/2012 09:29 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
>
>> Any questions?
>> Do you support or oppose me asking FD.o admins to allow hidden bugs on
>> Mesa's bugzilla?
>>
>> Benoit
> I support this. It seems a sensible proposal for addressing security bugs.
>
Thank
On 11/20/2012 09:29 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> Any questions?
> Do you support or oppose me asking FD.o admins to allow hidden bugs on
> Mesa's bugzilla?
>
> Benoit
I support this. It seems a sensible proposal for addressing security bugs.
___
mesa-dev
On 11/20/12 09:29 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
> Both solutions are poor, and a better solution would be for Mesa's
> bugzilla to allow hidden security bugs so we could work there. Given
> that security bug discussion can't be open, that is the "least bad"
> solution possible.
For what it's worth, Mesa
List,
I was told to send this to freedesktop.org admins, but as I fully expect
that this will be controversial among some Mesa developers, I thought
that I would write to this list first and check that there is enough
agreement here.
WebGL-enabled browsers have faced security bugs in all drivers
11 matches
Mail list logo
