On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> I wonder if we'll be able to support ES 3.1 on Intel Sandy Bridge,
> NVIDIA Tesla family (G80-GT218), or ATI R600/R700 GPU's, all of which
> support ES 3.0 today. OTOH, they're unlikely targets for ES software.
Not on Sandybridge -- no compute
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 04:29 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> On 11/04/2015 03:26 PM, Ryan Houdek wrote:
I'm hoping to potentially convince about lowering the minimum
requirement of EXT_buffe
On 11/09/2015 04:29 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 11/04/2015 03:26 PM, Ryan Houdek wrote:
>>> I'm hoping to potentially convince about lowering the minimum
>>> requirement of EXT_buffer_storage from ES 3.1 to ES 3.0.
>>> The only thing that caus
On 11/09/2015 04:10 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 03:26 PM, Ryan Houdek wrote:
>> I'm hoping to potentially convince about lowering the minimum
>> requirement of EXT_buffer_storage from ES 3.1 to ES 3.0.
>> The only thing that causes it to require ES 3.1 is glMemoryBarrier,
>> which shoul
In particular I was thinking about a3xx hardware that most likely can't
physically support ES 3.1, and also drivers that may not get it for a long
while.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > On 11/04/2015 03:26 PM, Ryan Hou
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 03:26 PM, Ryan Houdek wrote:
>> I'm hoping to potentially convince about lowering the minimum
>> requirement of EXT_buffer_storage from ES 3.1 to ES 3.0.
>> The only thing that causes it to require ES 3.1 is glMemoryBarrier,
>> wh
On 11/04/2015 03:26 PM, Ryan Houdek wrote:
> I'm hoping to potentially convince about lowering the minimum
> requirement of EXT_buffer_storage from ES 3.1 to ES 3.0.
> The only thing that causes it to require ES 3.1 is glMemoryBarrier,
> which shouldn't really be a hard requirement since the extens
I'm hoping to potentially convince about lowering the minimum requirement
of EXT_buffer_storage from ES 3.1 to ES 3.0.
The only thing that causes it to require ES 3.1 is glMemoryBarrier, which
shouldn't really be a hard requirement since the extension can be used
without it.
This is also a similar
