Yup, that's the same exact patch that I sent to the LLVM list. It's
been working just fine along with the mesa patch in:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91764
I've been using that on my own system for a while now. It could
probably use more eyes/testing, but it seems ok from my us
"Armin K." writes:
> This would be easier to fix in LLVM. The newline is rather unnecessary
> in the output.
I'm neither able or willing to hack LLVM, but
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91751 looks nice?
--
X was an interactive protocol:
alpha blending a full-screen image looked
On 02/04/2014 05:24 PM, Krzysztof A. Sobiecki wrote:
> A small patch to work around a llvm-config-3.5 change, with a newline
> hack.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/li
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 05:24 PM, Krzysztof A. Sobiecki wrote:
>> A small patch to work around a llvm-config-3.5 change, with a newline
>> hack.
>>
>
> This would be easier to fix in LLVM. The newline is rather unnecessary
> in the output.
>
I fully agree.
A small patch to work around a llvm-config-3.5 change, with a newline
hack.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Sobiecki gmail.com>
Tested-by: Kai Wasserbäch
---
LLVM 3.5 added --system-libs to llvm-config, fix build failure.
Fixes #70410
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index ba158e8..c31d962 10
