2010/8/27 Brian Paul :
> On 08/27/2010 06:26 AM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>>
>> 2010/8/27 Chia-I Wu:
>>>
>>> 2010/8/27 Kristian Høgsberg:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM, nobled wrote:
I can't speak for EGL_MESA_screen_surface, but shipping unauthorized
tokens certainly is a p
On 08/27/2010 06:26 AM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
2010/8/27 Chia-I Wu:
2010/8/27 Kristian Høgsberg:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM, nobled wrote:
I can't speak for EGL_MESA_screen_surface, but shipping unauthorized
tokens certainly is a problem.
I am not aware of any user of EGL_MESA_screen_
2010/8/27 Chia-I Wu :
> 2010/8/27 Kristian Høgsberg :
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM, nobled wrote:
>> I can't speak for EGL_MESA_screen_surface, but shipping unauthorized
>> tokens certainly is a problem.
> I am not aware of any user of EGL_MESA_screen_surface. It was
> designed for Xegl wh
2010/8/27 Kristian Høgsberg :
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM, nobled wrote:
>> This is a little long, but I was wondering about a couple of the EGL
>> extensions Mesa implements:
>>
>> Re: the new EGL_KHR_screenless_opengl and friends that took up the
>> functionality of EGL_MESA_no_surface -
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM, nobled wrote:
> This is a little long, but I was wondering about a couple of the EGL
> extensions Mesa implements:
>
> Re: the new EGL_KHR_screenless_opengl and friends that took up the
> functionality of EGL_MESA_no_surface - are there specs for those
> anywhere
This is a little long, but I was wondering about a couple of the EGL
extensions Mesa implements:
Re: the new EGL_KHR_screenless_opengl and friends that took up the
functionality of EGL_MESA_no_surface - are there specs for those
anywhere on the web? Google gave nothing but Mesa itself, and the KHR
