Hi,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 18:58, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Monday, 2019-02-18 17:31:41 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Two hours of end-to-end pipeline time is also obviously far too long.
> > Amongst other things, it practically precludes pre-merge CI: by the
> > time your build has finished, s
On Monday, 2019-02-18 17:31:41 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi all,
> A few people have noted that Mesa's GitLab CI is just too slow, and
> not usable in day-to-day development, which is a massive shame.
Agreed :/
>
> I looked into it a bit this morning, and also discussed it with Emil,
> though
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:32 AM Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> A few people have noted that Mesa's GitLab CI is just too slow, and
> not usable in day-to-day development, which is a massive shame.
>
> I looked into it a bit this morning, and also discussed it with Emil,
> though nothing in this
Hi all,
A few people have noted that Mesa's GitLab CI is just too slow, and
not usable in day-to-day development, which is a massive shame.
I looked into it a bit this morning, and also discussed it with Emil,
though nothing in this is speaking for him.
Taking one of the last runs as representati
