> My take is (and always has been) that the point of GL3.txt is to coordinate
> amongst developers, so clarity is paramount.
I completely understand and I'm sure we can do both. The problem here is
simply that we're mixing dev comments and feature statuses.
I'm working on a way to simply edit GL3
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Romain Failliot
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Two extensions have been recently flagged "DONE (core only)".
> From what we understood [1], it means that it's done in mesa, but drivers
> need to implement it.
>
> So, first: is that it?
Yes. (More like enable it... no implementa
Hi!
Two extensions have been recently flagged "DONE (core only)".
>From what we understood [1], it means that it's done in mesa, but drivers
need to implement it.
So, first: is that it?
And, second: if it is, could we change for the syntax made for it: "DONE
()"?
I'll be happy to do the patch as
