Ah it's not a regression, in that case it might be possible to profile the
running benchmark to see where some bottlenecks lie, but from what ive read
on here before, this is difficult to set up and the results aren't always
useful.
As you're unaffected by this I doubt you'll be able to help furth
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:59 AM, ⚛ <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The result file at
> http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1606180-PTS-MIDJUNEA78 is showing
> multiple issues, some of them are:
>
> [Minor issue] Kernel 4.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160616 has a
> performance regressi
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 20.06.2016 11:59, wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> The result file at
>> http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1606180-PTS-MIDJUNEA78 is showing
>> multiple issues, some of them are:
>>
>> [Minor issue] Kernel 4.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160616 ha
On 20.06.2016 11:59, ⚛ wrote:
Hello.
The result file at
http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1606180-PTS-MIDJUNEA78 is showing
multiple issues, some of them are:
[Minor issue] Kernel 4.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160616 has a
performance regression on R9 290
[Major issue] R7 370 yields 133 FPS in
Hello.
The result file at
http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1606180-PTS-MIDJUNEA78 is showing
multiple issues, some of them are:
[Minor issue] Kernel 4.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20160616 has a
performance regression on R9 290
[Major issue] R7 370 yields 133 FPS in Tesseract, while R9 285
unexpec