Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Brian Paul wrote: > Keith Whitwell wrote: >>> >>> We currently allow partial specification of position, requiring only >>> (x, y) and filling in z as 0 and w as 1 if missing. Is that still >>> valid? Similarly, colors may be specified as (r, g, b) triplets with >>>

Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

Keith Whitwell wrote: We currently allow partial specification of position, requiring only (x, y) and filling in z as 0 and w as 1 if missing. Is that still valid? Similarly, colors may be specified as (r, g, b) triplets with no alpha, and alpha defaults to 1. Is that still valid, or are there ch

Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

> > We currently allow partial specification of position, requiring only > (x, y) and filling in z as 0 and w as 1 if missing. Is that still > valid? Similarly, colors may be specified as (r, g, b) triplets with > no alpha, and alpha defaults to 1. Is that still valid, or are there > changes furt

Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

On 24.06.2010 01:36, Brian Paul wrote: > I'll try to answer a few... > > > Corbin Simpson wrote: >> Yep, it's that time again. These are just things marked in the docs as >> unknown, so I'm not grinding any axes, just cleaning stuff up. >> >> ~ "If a surface includes several layers/slices (XXX: n

Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

I would be happy to start another page for that. We are starting to get too stuffed on that TGSI page. Posting from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C. On Jun 23, 2010 7:25 PM, "Brian Paul" wrote: On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Corbin Simpson wrote: > Very cool. I l... I removed the info be

Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Corbin Simpson wrote: > Very cool. I like the new information, although a couple pieces of > information vanished. > > We currently allow partial specification of position, requiring only > (x, y) and filling in z as 0 and w as 1 if missing. Is that still > valid?

Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Brian Paul wrote: > I'll try to answer a few... > > > Corbin Simpson wrote: >> >> Yep, it's that time again. These are just things marked in the docs as >> unknown, so I'm not grinding any axes, just cleaning stuff up. >> >> ~ "If a surface includes several layers/

Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

I'll try to answer a few... Corbin Simpson wrote: Yep, it's that time again. These are just things marked in the docs as unknown, so I'm not grinding any axes, just cleaning stuff up. ~ "If a surface includes several layers/slices (XXX: not yet...) then all layers will be cleared." From the in

Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

Marek Olšák wrote: On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Marek Olšák > wrote: On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Corbin Simpson mailto:mostawesomed...@gmail.com>> wrote: Yep, it's that time again. These are just things marked in the docs as un

Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Corbin Simpson < > mostawesomed...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yep, it's that time again. These are just things marked in the docs as >> unknown, so I'm not grinding any axes, just cleaning stuff up. >> >> ~ "If a

Re: [Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Corbin Simpson wrote: > Yep, it's that time again. These are just things marked in the docs as > unknown, so I'm not grinding any axes, just cleaning stuff up. > > ~ "If a surface includes several layers/slices (XXX: not yet...) then > all layers will be cleared."

[Mesa-dev] Gallium API questions

Yep, it's that time again. These are just things marked in the docs as unknown, so I'm not grinding any axes, just cleaning stuff up. ~ "If a surface includes several layers/slices (XXX: not yet...) then all layers will be cleared." From the information on pipe_context::clear(). Is this just wishf