Hello,
I'm a Belgian young student and I follow the Mesa's development for nearly two
years now. I'm just 18 yars old and it's the first year I'm elligible to the
Google Summer of Code.
I originally planned to work on KDE, but I find Mesa more interesting. The
project on which I would work is
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:18 PM, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:06 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:52 PM, José Fonseca wrote:
>> > If we want a cleaner / more agile code base, then we could fork off the
>> > old mesa drivers which aren't being actively maint
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:06 -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:52 PM, José Fonseca wrote:
> > If we want a cleaner / more agile code base, then we could fork off the
> > old mesa drivers which aren't being actively maintained/tested into a
> > separate branch, put them in just-b
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:52 PM, José Fonseca wrote:
> If we want a cleaner / more agile code base, then we could fork off the
> old mesa drivers which aren't being actively maintained/tested into a
> separate branch, put them in just-bugfixes/no-new-features life support
> mode; therefore allowin
I also agree with Marek FWIW.
If we want a cleaner / more agile code base, then we could fork off the
old mesa drivers which aren't being actively maintained/tested into a
separate branch, put them in just-bugfixes/no-new-features life support
mode; therefore allowing greater freedom to refactor s
Hello,
Thank you for your mail, it's exactly what I need to be able to find the right
GSoC project. I agree with you for most of the points, but I have some small
comments.
> I don't think forking the current Mesa codebase and making a
> Core-profile-only state tracker is a good idea. The Open
Denis,
I completely agree with Marek. It always sounds exciting to start
with a clean slate and disregard the "old" code but I don't think it's
the right move here.
A very large portion of the 4.1 core profile overlaps with the code we
have now and the code we need to write to support OpenGL 3.x
Hi Denis,
I don't think forking the current Mesa codebase and making a
Core-profile-only state tracker is a good idea. The OpenGL 4.1 Core and
Compatibility specifications have 518 and 678 pages, respectively, which
means more than 70% of the codebase would be the same. The Core profile is
not so
Sounds quite cool. This would definitely be a worthwhile project. My
only concern is that this would be too much work for a single summer.
Projects should err on the side of being too small rather than too
big.
I'd definitely recommend applying when applications are open.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at
Hello,
I'm a Belgian young student and I follow the Mesa's development for nearly two
years now. I'm just 18 yars old and it's the first year I'm elligible to the
Google Summer of Code.
I originally planned to work on KDE, but I find Mesa more interesting. The
project on which I would work is
10 matches
Mail list logo
