On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 11:35 -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 10:31 -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 07:52 -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > > On
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 10:31 -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 07:52 -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > On 7/21/12 5:53 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > > > > - Original Mes
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 10:31 -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 07:52 -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > On 7/21/12 5:53 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > > > - Original Message -
> > > > >> Hi guys
> > > > >>
>
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 07:52 -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > On 7/21/12 5:53 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > >> Hi guys
> > > >>
> > > >> LLVM 2.8 doesn't appear to have mcjit, so we end up with no
>
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 07:52 -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On 7/21/12 5:53 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > >> Hi guys
> > >>
> > >> LLVM 2.8 doesn't appear to have mcjit, so we end up with no llvm
> > >> libs
> > >> defined,
> > >
> > >
- Original Message -
> On 7/26/12 10:52 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Are the problems of mcjit simply a superset
> >> of the problems with the old jit?
> >
> > The only reason we started to look at mcjit was because old jit
> > didn't support avx. But on c
On 7/26/12 10:52 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
- Original Message -
Are the problems of mcjit simply a superset
of the problems with the old jit?
The only reason we started to look at mcjit was because old jit didn't support
avx. But on current trunk (ie llvm-3.2) it does.
To be honest, ap
- Original Message -
> On 7/21/12 5:53 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> Hi guys
> >>
> >> LLVM 2.8 doesn't appear to have mcjit, so we end up with no llvm
> >> libs
> >> defined,
> >
> > Yes, mcjit is only used/necessary from llvm-3.1 onwards, so the
> > autocon
On 7/21/12 5:53 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi guys
LLVM 2.8 doesn't appear to have mcjit, so we end up with no llvm libs
defined,
Yes, mcjit is only used/necessary from llvm-3.1 onwards, so the autoconf code
should check conditiionally.
BTW, I'll soon commit a chan
I went ahead and pushed it. Hopefully it should fix it.
Jose
- Original Message -
> The attached patch should fix, but I don't have a machine with old
> llvm now.
>
> Jose
>
> - Original Message -
> > - Original Message -
> > > Hi guys
> > >
> > > LLVM 2.8 doesn't appea
- Original Message -
> > Yes, mcjit is only used/necessary from llvm-3.1 onwards, so the
> > autoconf code should check conditiionally.
> >
> > BTW, I'll soon commit a change that will stop using mcjit from 3.2
> > onwards (as with the current LLVM 3.2 trunk, AVX is supported by
> > the old
The attached patch should fix, but I don't have a machine with old llvm now.
Jose
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > Hi guys
> >
> > LLVM 2.8 doesn't appear to have mcjit, so we end up with no llvm
> > libs
> > defined,
>
> Yes, mcjit is only used/necessary from llv
> Yes, mcjit is only used/necessary from llvm-3.1 onwards, so the autoconf code
> should check conditiionally.
>
> BTW, I'll soon commit a change that will stop using mcjit from 3.2 onwards
> (as with the current LLVM 3.2 trunk, AVX is supported by the old jit, which
> is more stable/polished).
- Original Message -
> Hi guys
>
> LLVM 2.8 doesn't appear to have mcjit, so we end up with no llvm libs
> defined,
Yes, mcjit is only used/necessary from llvm-3.1 onwards, so the autoconf code
should check conditiionally.
BTW, I'll soon commit a change that will stop using mcjit from
Hi guys
LLVM 2.8 doesn't appear to have mcjit, so we end up with no llvm libs
defined, look at the recent build failures in tinderbox.x.org.
Dave.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mes
15 matches
Mail list logo