On 03/08/2011 11:22 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
mailto:thellst...@vmware.com>> wrote:
On 03/08/2011 05:11 PM, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 02:38 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Ma
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 05:11 PM, José Fonseca wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 02:38 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>>
>>>
2) is_resource_referenced
Now that the transfe
On 03/08/2011 05:11 PM, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 02:38 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
2) is_resource_referenced
Now that the transfer functions are in pipe_context, is this hook
really
necessary?
Good quest
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:11 PM, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 02:38 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > > 2) is_resource_referenced
> > >
> > > Now that the transfer functions are in pipe_context, is this hook
> > > really
> > >
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 02:38 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > 2) is_resource_referenced
> >
> > Now that the transfer functions are in pipe_context, is this hook
> > really
> > necessary?
>
> Good question. I'd like to see those functions go
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 18:52 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > 6) Pixel buffer objects
> > >
> > > It woud be nice to have hardware-accelerated PBO copy in Gallium.
> > > Would
> > > resource_copy_region be a good candidate for this, where one of
> the
> > > arguments would be PIPE_BUFFER and the other
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have several questions about Gallium. Some of them are about
> > undocumented
> > stuff, others are just little things from the top of my head. Please
> > consider
On 03/07/2011 03:38 AM, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
7) Stippling and smoothing
Would anyone be against removing these two from the Gallium interface
and
fully implementing them in st/mesa? It's not like any of the radeon
people
wants to implemen
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have several questions about Gallium. Some of them are about undocumented
> > stuff, others are just little things from the top of my head. Please
> > consider these as thin
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have several questions about Gallium. Some of them are about undocumented
> stuff, others are just little things from the top of my head. Please
> consider these as things I may do when time allows.
>
>
> 1) Flush flags
>
> Which PIPE_
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have several questions about Gallium. Some of them are about
> undocumented
> stuff, others are just little things from the top of my head. Please
> consider these as things I may do when time allows.
>
>
> 1) Flush flags
>
>
Hi,
I have several questions about Gallium. Some of them are about undocumented
stuff, others are just little things from the top of my head. Please
consider these as things I may do when time allows.
1) Flush flags
Which PIPE_FLUSH_* flag is used to flush the command stream? There doesn't
seem
12 matches
Mail list logo
