On 22.04.2015 20:14, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> Updated numbers look a lot better!
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> Without NIR:
>>>
>>> total instructions in shared programs: 6190374 -> 6190153 (-0.00%)
>>> instruction
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Updated numbers look a lot better!
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> Without NIR:
>>
>> total instructions in shared programs: 6190374 -> 6190153 (-0.00%)
>> instructions in affected programs: 61126 -> 60905 (-0.36
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> What made the difference here?
>
> I think it's probably just that
>
> commit 4dacb212fdcc82def02b8c9233f94caa5a8a3000
> Author: Matt Turner
> Date: Thu Apr 2 10:21:16 2015 -0700
>
>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> What made the difference here?
I think it's probably just that
commit 4dacb212fdcc82def02b8c9233f94caa5a8a3000
Author: Matt Turner
Date: Thu Apr 2 10:21:16 2015 -0700
nir: Allow abs/neg in select peephole pass.
total instructi
What made the difference here?
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Updated numbers look a lot better!
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> Without NIR:
>>
>> total instructions in shared programs: 6190374 -> 6190153 (-0.00%)
>> instructions in affected pr
Updated numbers look a lot better!
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Without NIR:
>
> total instructions in shared programs: 6190374 -> 6190153 (-0.00%)
> instructions in affected programs: 61126 -> 60905 (-0.36%)
> helped:156
total instruc
Without NIR:
total instructions in shared programs: 6190374 -> 6190153 (-0.00%)
instructions in affected programs: 61126 -> 60905 (-0.36%)
helped:156
With NIR:
total instructions in shared programs: 6271584 -> 6271471 (-0.00%)
instructions in affected programs
