On Dec 30, 2016 9:57 PM, "Timothy Arceri"
wrote:
On Fri, 2016-12-30 at 19:23 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2016 3:50 AM, "Timothy Arceri" om> wrote:
> If one of the inputs to the multiplcation in ffma is the result of
> an fmul there is a chance that we can reuse the result of that
>
On Fri, 2016-12-30 at 19:23 -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2016 3:50 AM, "Timothy Arceri" om> wrote:
> If one of the inputs to the multiplcation in ffma is the result of
> an fmul there is a chance that we can reuse the result of that
> fmul in other ffma calls if we do the multiplicati
On Dec 30, 2016 3:50 AM, "Timothy Arceri"
wrote:
If one of the inputs to the multiplcation in ffma is the result of
an fmul there is a chance that we can reuse the result of that
fmul in other ffma calls if we do the multiplication in the right
order.
For example it is a fairly common pattern fo
If one of the inputs to the multiplcation in ffma is the result of
an fmul there is a chance that we can reuse the result of that
fmul in other ffma calls if we do the multiplication in the right
order.
For example it is a fairly common pattern for shaders to do something
similar to this:
const
