On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 17:11:30 +0900
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 26/04/17 07:06 PM, Gregory Hainaut wrote:
> > On 4/26/17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
> >
> > I didn't test it (yet). But I think it is safe to call XCB from
> > various threads. However if one thread use X
On 26/04/17 07:06 PM, Gregory Hainaut wrote:
> On 4/26/17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 26/04/17 05:07 PM, Gregory Hainaut wrote:
>>> Following the discussion in "[PATCH v4 0/3] asynchronous pbo transfer with
>>> glthread"
>>>
>>> It will help apps that are ported to XCB.
>>
>> How so?
>
> I didn't
On 4/26/17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 26/04/17 05:07 PM, Gregory Hainaut wrote:
>> Following the discussion in "[PATCH v4 0/3] asynchronous pbo transfer with
>> glthread"
>>
>> It will help apps that are ported to XCB.
>
> How so?
I didn't test it (yet). But I think it is safe to call XCB from
va
On 26/04/17 05:07 PM, Gregory Hainaut wrote:
> Following the discussion in "[PATCH v4 0/3] asynchronous pbo transfer with
> glthread"
>
> It will help apps that are ported to XCB.
How so?
> But Xlib (without XInitThread) apps will still crash when glthread is
> enabled on DRI2.
Do the crashes
Following the discussion in "[PATCH v4 0/3] asynchronous pbo transfer with
glthread"
It will help apps that are ported to XCB. But Xlib (without XInitThread) apps
will still crash when glthread is enabled on DRI2.
I only tested the patch on Nouveau
There are 3 remaining possibilities
* Won't fi
