After some discussion, this seems to be a good idea. BTW I'd like to
keep the use_reusable_pool parameter in case we change our opinion.
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> ---
>
> This is just an RFC; if other develo
On 10.04.2014 11:23, Michel Dänzer wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer
---
This is just an RFC; if other developers approve of this approach, I can
make a more extensive patch removing the use_reusable_pool parameters.
The x11perf numbers below compare ShmGet/PutImage before and after this
change with
Hi Michel,
I was thinking of doing this for transfers only, because Glamor does a
lot of transfers. What do you think?
Marek
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> ---
>
> This is just an RFC; if other developers approve of this approach, I can
> make
From: Michel Dänzer
---
This is just an RFC; if other developers approve of this approach, I can
make a more extensive patch removing the use_reusable_pool parameters.
The x11perf numbers below compare ShmGet/PutImage before and after this
change with glamor from keithp's glamor-server xserver
