On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> If you do this, you'll be back to always needing a mutable copy. Most
>> lowering and optimization passes die the moment t
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> If you do this, you'll be back to always needing a mutable copy. Most
> lowering and optimization passes die the moment they see a register.
> You'll
> either have to go fi
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
If you do this, you'll be back to always needing a mutable copy. Most
lowering and optimization passes die the moment they see a register.
You'll
either have to go fix a bunch of stuff up to no-op properly or run
vars_t
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Connor Abbott
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >>>
>> It is a mix.. I do texcoord saturate, clip-plane,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Connor Abbott
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Rob Clark
> wrote
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrot
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Connor Abbott
wrote:
> On Mo
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jason Ekstrand
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Connor Abb
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Connor Abbott
wrote:
> On
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jason Ekstrand
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Connor Abbott
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:13 AM,
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Connor Abbott
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Rob Clark
> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Connor Abbot
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Tue, D
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Connor Abbott
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Connor Abbott
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Connor Abbott
> wrote:
> O
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jason Ekstrand
>>> wrote:
I think two different concepts of ownership are getting confla
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>>
>>> I think two different concepts of ownership are getting conflated here:
>>> Right/responsibility to delete and right to modi
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>
>> I think two different concepts of ownership are getting conflated here:
>> Right/responsibility to delete and right to modify.
>>
>> The way I understand it, gallium, as it stands, giv
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> I think two different concepts of ownership are getting conflated here:
> Right/responsibility to delete and right to modify.
>
> The way I understand it, gallium, as it stands, gives neither to the driver.
> A back-end using NIR requires
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 21, 2015 1:37 PM, "Marek Olšák" wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Dec 21, 2015 9:09 AM, "Connor Abbott" wr
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2015 1:37 PM, "Marek Olšák" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Jason Ekstrand
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Dec 21, 2015 9:09 AM, "Connor Abbott" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>
On Dec 21, 2015 1:37 PM, "Marek Olšák" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 21, 2015 9:09 AM, "Connor Abbott" wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Connor Abbott
> >> > wrote:
>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2015 9:09 AM, "Connor Abbott" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Connor Abbott
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> >>>
On Dec 21, 2015 9:09 AM, "Connor Abbott" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Connor Abbott
wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
>
>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Jason Ekstrand
>>> wrote:
On Dec 20, 2015 7:43 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
>
>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 20, 2015 7:43 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Connor Abbott
wrote:
>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 20, 2015 7:43 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Connor Abbott
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> >> On S
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2015 7:43 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Connor Abbott
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Jason Ekstrand
>> >> wrote:
>> >
On Dec 20, 2015 7:43 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Connor Abbott
wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 19, 2015 5:55 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
>
> From:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 19, 2015 5:55 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
From: Rob Clark
Jason,
How much do you hate th
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2015 5:55 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>>
>>> Jason,
>>>
>>> How much do you hate this idea? Seems like an easy alternative to
>>> using ralloc ctx's
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2015 5:55 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
>>
>> From: Rob Clark
>>
>> Jason,
>>
>> How much do you hate this idea? Seems like an easy alternative to
>> using ralloc ctx's to clean up nir variants/clones, which would let
>> us drop the
On Dec 19, 2015 5:55 PM, "Rob Clark" wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Jason,
>
> How much do you hate this idea? Seems like an easy alternative to
> using ralloc ctx's to clean up nir variants/clones, which would let
> us drop the parent memctx for nir_shader_create()/clone(), making
> it easier t
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> Why don't you just introduce a reference-counted wrapper around a
> nir_shader * and pass that around instead? This seems like a
> gallium-specific problem, so modifying other things to work around it
> doesn't seem so appealing.
1) I wanted
Why don't you just introduce a reference-counted wrapper around a
nir_shader * and pass that around instead? This seems like a
gallium-specific problem, so modifying other things to work around it
doesn't seem so appealing.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark
>
>
From: Rob Clark
Jason,
How much do you hate this idea? Seems like an easy alternative to
using ralloc ctx's to clean up nir variants/clones, which would let
us drop the parent memctx for nir_shader_create()/clone(), making
it easier to introduce reference counting.
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i9
39 matches
Mail list logo