On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 08:44:54AM -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>On Mar 11, 2016 11:47 PM, "Pohjolainen, Topi"
><[1]topi.pohjolai...@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 05:59:37PM -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> >On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Topi Pohjolainen
On Mar 11, 2016 11:47 PM, "Pohjolainen, Topi"
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 05:59:37PM -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Topi Pohjolainen
> ><[1]topi.pohjolai...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The logic iterates over param[] which contains pointers to
>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 05:59:37PM -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Topi Pohjolainen
><[1]topi.pohjolai...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> The logic iterates over param[] which contains pointers to
> uniform storage set during linking (see
> link_assign_u
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Topi Pohjolainen <
topi.pohjolai...@intel.com> wrote:
> The logic iterates over param[] which contains pointers to
> uniform storage set during linking (see
> link_assign_uniform_locations()).
>
> The pointers are unique and it should be impossible to find
> matchi
The logic iterates over param[] which contains pointers to
uniform storage set during linking (see
link_assign_uniform_locations()).
The pointers are unique and it should be impossible to find
matching entries.
I couldn't find any regressions with test system. In addition
I tried several benchmar
