On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 13/01/14 18:47, Tom Stellard wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 03:53:58PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> While going though mesa's build systems I was wondering what it would
>>> take to improve the overall experience of
On 13/01/14 18:47, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 03:53:58PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> While going though mesa's build systems I was wondering what it would
>> take to improve the overall experience of build testing.
>>
>> The only thing I can think of is a more
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 03:53:58PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> While going though mesa's build systems I was wondering what it would
> take to improve the overall experience of build testing.
>
> The only thing I can think of is a more centralised solution similar to
> the one us
Hello list,
While going though mesa's build systems I was wondering what it would
take to improve the overall experience of build testing.
The only thing I can think of is a more centralised solution similar to
the one used by wine [1]. Having buildbots test every patch what is send
to the ML [2]
