This is OK but the code also needs to compile with Visual C++.
Marek
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:34 PM, David Riley wrote:
> Without this change, dlopen()/dlclose() of any driver results in memory
> being leaked which becomes problematic if things are being reinitialized
> repeatedly (eg from a fu
Without this change, dlopen()/dlclose() of any driver results in memory
being leaked which becomes problematic if things are being reinitialized
repeatedly (eg from a fuzzer).
Even with this change, repeated dlopen()/dlclose() results in a single
LLVM mutex being allocated and never freed (used to
