On 30 May 2017 at 16:01, gregory hainaut wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:12:05 +0100
> Emil Velikov wrote:
>
>> On 29 May 2017 at 15:45, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>> > Hi Gregory,
>> >
>> > there isn't currently a copy of this on Mesa-Patchwork.
>> > Can you please send one over there?
>> >
>> > And
On Mon, 29 May 2017 17:12:05 +0100
Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 29 May 2017 at 15:45, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > Hi Gregory,
> >
> > there isn't currently a copy of this on Mesa-Patchwork.
> > Can you please send one over there?
> >
> > And maybe an updated version of:
> > [PATCH v5 0/3] asynchronous
On 29 May 2017 at 15:45, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> there isn't currently a copy of this on Mesa-Patchwork.
> Can you please send one over there?
>
> And maybe an updated version of:
> [PATCH v5 0/3] asynchronous pbo transfer with glthread
>
> Would be awesome.
>
The series is in maste
Hi Gregory,
there isn't currently a copy of this on Mesa-Patchwork.
Can you please send one over there?
And maybe an updated version of:
[PATCH v5 0/3] asynchronous pbo transfer with glthread
Would be awesome.
Dieter
Am 29.05.2017 13:18, schrieb Gregory Hainaut:
Hello Mesa developers,
Follo
Hello Mesa developers,
Following the discussion from
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2017-April/153137.html
A check was added to ensure that X11 display can be locked. It should be enough
to ensure thread safety between X11 and glthread.
I also did the check on DRI3 as I'm not 10
