On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 16:26 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Originally we tried to handle this case based on
> slots_valid. However,
> there are a number of ways that this can go wrong. For one, we throw
> away any trailing slots which either aren't written or are set to
> VARYING_SLOT_PAD.
I do
Originally we tried to handle this case based on slots_valid. However,
there are a number of ways that this can go wrong. For one, we throw
away any trailing slots which either aren't written or are set to
VARYING_SLOT_PAD. Second, even if PSIZ is a valid slot, we may not
actually write anything
