On 19 October 2016 at 08:58, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 18/10/16 11:39 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 17 October 2016 at 08:56, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 14/10/16 07:02 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
* src/gallium/drivers/radeon/r600_pipe_common.c
No actual bug, yet misleading.
>>>
>>> If
On 18/10/16 11:39 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 17 October 2016 at 08:56, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 14/10/16 07:02 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>>> * src/gallium/drivers/radeon/r600_pipe_common.c
>>> No actual bug, yet misleading.
>>
>> If you want to call it that... I'd say this can be useful for d
On 17 October 2016 at 08:56, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 14/10/16 07:02 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 14 October 2016 at 09:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 14/10/16 05:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 14 October 2016 at 01:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 13/10/16 07:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 14/10/16 07:02 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 14 October 2016 at 09:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 14/10/16 05:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 14 October 2016 at 01:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 13/10/16 07:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 13 October 2016 at 04:07, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 14 October 2016 at 09:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 14/10/16 05:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 14 October 2016 at 01:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 13/10/16 07:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 13 October 2016 at 04:07, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 13/10/16 03:37 AM, Tobias Droste wrote:
On 14/10/16 05:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 14 October 2016 at 01:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 13/10/16 07:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 13 October 2016 at 04:07, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 13/10/16 03:37 AM, Tobias Droste wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016, 11:53:50 CEST schri
On 14 October 2016 at 01:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 13/10/16 07:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 13 October 2016 at 04:07, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 13/10/16 03:37 AM, Tobias Droste wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016, 11:53:50 CEST schrieb Emil Velikov:
>>
>> +LLVM_VERSION_REQ
On 14/10/16 09:54 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 13/10/16 11:16 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
>> I think there were some issues with some programs / games that had
>> clashing symbols but I'm not sure if that's still an issue
>
> I'm only aware of such issues with the Steam runtime, which are arguably
>
On 13/10/16 11:16 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
> If you recompile llvm and mesa each time, are there any downsides of
> using the shared libs?
No particular downsides come to mind, rather upsides:
* Generally no requirement to rebuild Mesa after changes to LLVM.
* Both LLVM and Mesa take significantly
On 13/10/16 07:14 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 13 October 2016 at 04:07, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 13/10/16 03:37 AM, Tobias Droste wrote:
>>> Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016, 11:53:50 CEST schrieb Emil Velikov:
>
> +LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_OPENCL=3.6.0
> +LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_R600=3.6.0
On Thursday, 13 October 2016, Mike Lothian > wrote:
> If you recompile llvm and mesa each time, are there any downsides of using
> the shared libs?
>
> How many devs rebuild package X when one of its dependencies has a bug fix
release. And how many think it's a good idea ;-)
Just some food for tho
If you recompile llvm and mesa each time, are there any downsides of using
the shared libs?
I think there were some issues with some programs / games that had clashing
symbols but I'm not sure if that's still an issue
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 at 11:15 Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 13 October 2016 at 04:0
On 13 October 2016 at 04:07, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 13/10/16 03:37 AM, Tobias Droste wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016, 11:53:50 CEST schrieb Emil Velikov:
+LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_OPENCL=3.6.0
+LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_R600=3.6.0
+LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_RADEONSI=3.6.0
>>>
>
On 13/10/16 03:37 AM, Tobias Droste wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016, 11:53:50 CEST schrieb Emil Velikov:
>>>
>>> +LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_OPENCL=3.6.0
>>> +LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_R600=3.6.0
>>> +LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_RADEONSI=3.6.0
>>
>> There's a small related gotcha: as-is at build time we ge
On 12 October 2016 at 19:37, Tobias Droste wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016, 11:53:50 CEST schrieb Emil Velikov:
>> >
>> > +dnl LLVM versions
>> > +LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_GALLIUM=3.3.0
>> > +LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_LLVMPIPE=3.6.0
>>
>> Not exactly sure why/how llvmpipe got 3.6 since the driver
Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016, 11:53:50 CEST schrieb Emil Velikov:
> >
> > +dnl LLVM versions
> > +LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_GALLIUM=3.3.0
> > +LLVM_VERSION_REQUIRED_LLVMPIPE=3.6.0
>
> Not exactly sure why/how llvmpipe got 3.6 since the driver reuses the
> "gallium" one.
Yes you're right. I'm going
On 12 October 2016 at 00:02, Tobias Droste wrote:
> Consolidate the required LLVM versions at the top where the other
> versions for dependencies are listed.
> Rework the LLVM_VERSION and LLVM_VERSION_INT calculation to make the
> format "x.y.z." possible.
>
Not sure how others feel, but I love th
Consolidate the required LLVM versions at the top where the other
versions for dependencies are listed.
Rework the LLVM_VERSION and LLVM_VERSION_INT calculation to make the
format "x.y.z." possible.
LLVM_VERSION_INT is now including LLVM_VERSION_PATCH.
For the C define HAVE_LLVM is set now which d
18 matches
Mail list logo
