Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 50/52] st/nine: Explicit nine requirements

2015-01-13 Thread Axel Davy
On 10/01/2015 14:27, David Heidelberg wrote : I'd prefer not have to revert this patch on my personal r400 based RS690 (laptop AMD X1250). You're correct, that most of applications won't run. Still, there are some earlier DX9 apps, which runs and LFS which shows really visible performance boo

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 50/52] st/nine: Explicit nine requirements

2015-01-10 Thread David Heidelberg
I'd prefer not have to revert this patch on my personal r400 based RS690 (laptop AMD X1250). You're correct, that most of applications won't run. Still, there are some earlier DX9 apps, which runs and LFS which shows really visible performance boost from unplayable 10 fps to 20-25fps fps. As

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 50/52] st/nine: Explicit nine requirements

2015-01-10 Thread Axel Davy
This patch raises nine requirements and disables nine for old hw that don't match them. It would be possible to make a lot of things work with these hw, though not everything, but it needs special care for them in the code, and since they are very old, it's better to drop explicitly support for th