On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 04:16:23PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Nanley Chery wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 04:08:49PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > In all three cases, we start with width and height taken from
> > > isl_surf::phys_slice0_extent_sa wh
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 04:12:17PM -0700, Nanley Chery wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 04:08:49PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > In all three cases, we start with width and height taken from
> > isl_surf::phys_slice0_extent_sa which is already in samples. There is no
> > need to do the conversi
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Nanley Chery wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 04:08:49PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > In all three cases, we start with width and height taken from
> > isl_surf::phys_slice0_extent_sa which is already in samples. There is no
> > need to do the conversion and
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 04:08:49PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> In all three cases, we start with width and height taken from
> isl_surf::phys_slice0_extent_sa which is already in samples. There is no
> need to do the conversion and doing so gives us an incorrect value.
Thanks for noticing this
In all three cases, we start with width and height taken from
isl_surf::phys_slice0_extent_sa which is already in samples. There is no
need to do the conversion and doing so gives us an incorrect value.
---
src/intel/isl/isl.c | 20
1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
diff --git
