On 31 May 2017 at 21:14, Jan Vesely wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 18:32 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 31 May 2017 at 18:18, Jan Vesely wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 17:48 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> > > On 31 May 2017 at 16:32, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 P
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Jan Vesely wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 18:32 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On 31 May 2017 at 18:18, Jan Vesely wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 17:48 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > > > On 31 May 2017 at 16:32, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2
On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 18:32 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 31 May 2017 at 18:18, Jan Vesely wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 17:48 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > > On 31 May 2017 at 16:32, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Jan Vesely
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2
On 31 May 2017 at 18:18, Jan Vesely wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 17:48 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 31 May 2017 at 16:32, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Jan Vesely wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 13:33 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> > > > On 29 May 2017 at 16:3
On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 17:48 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 31 May 2017 at 16:32, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Jan Vesely wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 13:33 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > > > On 29 May 2017 at 16:33, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > > > > The "ac" function
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 31 May 2017 at 16:32, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Jan Vesely wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 13:33 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 29 May 2017 at 16:33, Marek Olšák wrote:
> The "ac" functions could al
On 31 May 2017 at 16:32, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Jan Vesely wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 13:33 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 29 May 2017 at 16:33, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> > The "ac" functions could also be forked and put into r600 if people
>>> > want to prese
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Jan Vesely wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 13:33 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 29 May 2017 at 16:33, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> > The "ac" functions could also be forked and put into r600 if people
>> > want to preserve the OpenCL support. That would remove the depen
On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 13:33 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 29 May 2017 at 16:33, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > The "ac" functions could also be forked and put into r600 if people
> > want to preserve the OpenCL support. That would remove the dependency
> > on "ac".
> >
I thought amdgpu.a was supposed
On 29 May 2017 at 16:33, Marek Olšák wrote:
> The "ac" functions could also be forked and put into r600 if people
> want to preserve the OpenCL support. That would remove the dependency
> on "ac".
>
Any objections if we defer this to the person working on r600+OpenCL,
or is that a must for the ser
The "ac" functions could also be forked and put into r600 if people
want to preserve the OpenCL support. That would remove the dependency
on "ac".
Marek
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> The code hasn't bee en touched in a very long time, and was neve
From: Emil Velikov
The code hasn't bee en touched in a very long time, and was never
completed.
It is conditionally built only when OpenCL is selected at built time,
and pulls the libamd_common static library, which in itself depends on
amdgpu.
With later commit(s) we'll address the amdgpu depe
12 matches
Mail list logo
